Old Holy Trinity German National Parish

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Monastery of St. John of the Desert

Monastery of St. John of the DesertI came across the following article about the closing of the Monastery of St. John of the Desert in Ein Kerem, a suburb of Jerusalem, while researching the history of the Sisters of Our Lady of Zion who sing a few tracks on my newly purchased Christmas in the Holy Land CD. I was originally under the impression that this was their residence, but they are located at the Convent of St. John on the Mountain. This is very sad news in any case.

St. John Monastery forced to close by Israeli Fanatics and naked Hikers

Sunday, 14 October 2007

St. John in the Desert Monastery closes its gates following assault on father superior

by Gil Zohar

One of the most serene holy places in the vicinity of Jerusalem was recently compelled to restrict visits as a result of vandalism, bigotry and theft.

The Franciscan-run St. John in the Desert Monastery, which includes a convent, now only permits Christian pilgrims and secular groups led by a licensed tour guide. Reservations are required to visit the six-hectare Judean Hills shrine, which enjoys a spectacular location amidst heavily forested ancient agricultural terraces. The change in policy follows an altercation there last month involving a group of some 30 Jews described as "settlers" who assaulted the monastery's Father Superior Sergio Olmedo and then trashed the pilgrimage destination.

The monastery, located near Moshav Even Sapir on Hwy. 386, is dedicated to the life of John the Baptist. The shrine is built around the grotto where Christian tradition holds John and his mother lived, and the still-bubbling spring from which they drank. The Arabic name 'Ain al-Habis meaning Spring of the Hermit preserves the ancient tradition tying the place to John.

Elisabeth is buried on the grounds in a tomb that shows Byzantine, Crusader and 20th century construction. A group of nuns lead by Sister Maatje, originally from Neuchatel, Switzerland, live beside the tomb. St. John in the Desert has long been a favorite hiking destination for Jerusalemites, some of whom combine a visit there with a swim at the nearby Sataf Nature Preserve. Some of those Israeli visitors also came to the 'Ain al-Habis spring – which serves as a baptismal pool – to exploit it as a mikveh. In the spirit of ecumenicalism, Father Sergio permitted the parallel usage.

Unfortunately, he said, over his five years living there "the quality of the visitors has changed." Many of today's Israeli hikers are disrespectful of the site's holiness. "It's a place for meditation and prayer," said the Santiago, Chile-born monk, who has resided in Israel for 14 years.

Some visitors would hop the fence and trespass, armed with guns, he said, reciting a litany of abuse, boorishness and desecration. Women would immodestly wear bikinis at the baptismal pool while men would parade naked. Some would swim in the carp pond, notwithstanding the brackish water, and then wash off in the baptismal pool. Visitors would litter, and not clean up after their pet dogs defecated. Money would be pilfered from the alms collections box.

Not least of the disrespectful behavior was simply talking loudly, and preventing the monks from carrying out their daily routine of prayer.

St. John in the Desert is not just a monastery, explained Father Sergio, but a "hermitage, a place of silence and spiritual rejuvenation."

The final straw on the proverbial camel's back came in the afternoon of Friday, August 17. A group of about 30 men, some carrying machine guns, forced their way past the gate, demanded to use the pool as a mikveh and refused to leave, Father Sergio recounted. "They started to say 'Eretz Israel is our land, and you have to go.' They were very aggressive. They spit at me. They said 'You killed my family.'"

In the ensuing scuffle Father Sergio managed to photograph some of his assailants with his cell phone camera. They were wearing kippot and tzitzit, he noted. Some were dressed in orange in the fashion of activists protesting last summer's withdrawal from Gush Katif. Some were speaking English, and others Hebrew. Father Sergio, still badly shaken, characterized the group as fanatics. "I've seen these [kind of] people in Hebron." Before finally leaving, the enraged crowd went on a mini-pogrom, breaking water pipes, smashing potted plants, and destroying property. Father Sergio and the other monks subsequently found direction signs leading to the property had been vandalized so that the word "Franciscan" read "racist".

Father Sergio lodged a complaint with Israel Police and provided them with his digital photos. No arrests have been made at the time of this writing. The pool remains padlocked.

The full article can be read here: http://thetorontotimes.com/content/view/625/68/


Et in TERRA SANCTA pax hominibus bonæ voluntatis...

8 comments:

Mrs Jackie Parkes MJ said...

What a shame!

piusdodici said...

Why would Fr. let these people use a holy baptismal pool for a mikveh? This is desecration. The problem is this Ecumenism which Vatican II concocted, is not of the Holy Ghost. We do not accept all religions, we are convert to Jesus Christ. Outside the Church, there is NO salvation!

Miguel José Ernst-Sandoval said...

While I agree with you that this is desecration, as for œcumenism you must remember that VCII was a pastoral council and none of the documents produced by it are absolutely binding on the faithful under pain of mortal sin. Catholics are, however, bound to the disciplinary changes, unless the have been abrogated afterward.

Also, please try to steer clear of the heresy of Feeneyism.

On Feeneyism:
http://www.romancatholicism.org/feeney-condemnations.htm

Anonymous said...

Dear Miguel: Thanks for your warning about the Fr. Feeney! Now read this:

Father Feeney was a great priest. He was the only
priest in the U.S. back in the 1940's to stand firm in
the dogma Outside the Church There is No Salvation.
His story is a long one, but what happened to him was
that his students charged some priests at Boston
College of heresy in their rejection of that dogma,
but because the liberal (and heretical) "Cardinal"
Cushing rejected that dogma too, they began to attack
Fr. Feeney instead. Eventually, the head of the
Jesuits in Rome summoned Fr. Feeney (a jesuit) to Rome
without informing him of the charges against him. He
kept asking to be informed of the charges so he could
prepare his case, but he was never told the charges,
which is against canon law. So he decided not to go to
Rome until they specifically told him the charges. He
was then unjustly excommunicated for disobedience, and
NOT for heresy.

What's very telling about the Vatican II church is
that they call people who hold the salvation dogma
whole and entire "Feeneyites", as if Fr. Feeney was
the starter of this belief, which is, of course, not
true. Anyone of good will can easily research the
dogma and find that the Church has ALWAYS held this
belief. What's ironic is the fact that Fr. Feeney was
"reconciled" by the Vatican II church in the early
1970's WITHOUT HAVING TO RETRACT ANY OF HIS BELIEFS!
Therefore, the term "Feeneyite" that they use is quite
hypocritcal because it suggests an heretical belief.
If this were true, then he couldn't have been
reconciled without retracting his belief.

What's even MORE telling is the way this
"reconciliation" came about. All the workings of this
were done behind his back. He had no knowledge that
some people at St. Benedict Center (where he resided
with others who stood with him) were "making a deal"
with the bishop's office. Then one day, a
representative of the Boston Diocese showed up to his
home, but didn't say he was from the diocese. Fr.
Feeney was quite elderly by this time, and when his
visitor asked him to say an approved creed of the
Catholic Church, Fr. Feeney said the Athanasian Creed.
Once he finished his visitor quickly told him he was
"reconciled" and the excommunication was lifted, and
he left.

Read the Athanasian Creed, which is an approved Creed
of the Catholic Church. It also says firmly that there
is no salvation outside the Catholic Church.

Miguel José Ernst-Sandoval said...

I am not an Irish-American Jansenist. I trust what the Holy See had to say on the matter. Rome has spoken...

Miguel José Ernst-Sandoval said...

http://www.romancatholicism.org/feeney-condemnations.htm#a2

Anonymous said...

You are absolutely right, Rome did speak! Fr. Feeney's excommunication was lifted and Rome did NOT ask him to recant ONE thing!

Miguel José Ernst-Sandoval said...

But the heresy of Feeneyism itself was condemned, whether or not the person thought originally responsible for it was cleared.

 
<bgsound src=''></bgsound>